Blog

Private Fund Service Provider League Tables Shows Further Hints of Change


Do you want to know which service providers have been hired to support the new private funds launched in the past year or so? After all, some of them may turn into the next billion-dollar hedge, private equity or real estate fund.

So do we. We took a look at the 9AT database to produce something of an update to last year’s version of this endeavor.  

At the same time, we dug into at the overall picture, to try and understand which firms dominated their category – or not. Form ADV asks private fund sponsors to list the auditors, custodians, fund administrators and prime brokers.  

Here is what we found...

Auditors

Last year, EY, Deloitte, PwC, KPMG and BDO were the five most common auditors hired by new funds (based on the aggregate gross asset value (GAV) of the funds). It’s the same story this year, albeit in a different order, and the five firms also provide the top five auditors for all funds (new and existing) at both year-end last year, and on September 1st this year (table 2).

Looking slightly beyond the top five is where it starts to get a little more interesting, however. On the surface, it appears that both RSM and Grant Thornton came very close to dislodging BDO from fifth spot overall – see Table 2b below. The interesting observation is, however, that in the past eight months, BDO has increased its GAV under audit.

Table 1: Top Five Fund Auditors of New Funds Identified from 2025 Form ADV Filings, Jan-Aug, sorted by GAV

RankingAuditorGAV ($bn)AdvisersFunds
1PwC$603.63241,181
2EY$559.63871,611
3KPMG$312.5346974
4Deloitte$214.4274947
5BDO$39.2105282

Table 2: Top Five Auditors of All Funds Identified from latest Form ADV Filings, as of Aug 31, 2025

RankingAuditorFunds GAV- Current ($bn)Funds GAV- YE2024 ($bn)% Market Share- Current% Market Share- YE2024
1EY$ 9,902$ 9,33932%31%
2PWC$ 8,115$ 7,67826%26%
3KPMG$ 5,115$ 5,18616%17%
4Deloitte$ 4,873$ 4,56416%15%
5BDO$ 581$ 5082%2%

Table 2b: Auditors of All Funds Identified from latest Form ADV Filings, as of Aug 31, 2025, Positions Five-Seven

RankingAuditorFunds GAV- CurrentFunds GAV- YE2024
5BDO$ 581,311,904,525$ 508,075,734,589
6RSM$ 568,147,874,719$ 537,680,072,634
7Grant Thornton$ 566,585,408,966$ 571,847,495,076

Custodians

There is an interesting observation in the new funds’ cohort of the custodian category, regardless of whether you sort the league table by aggregate GAV or the total number of funds services.

In the former method, Credit Agricole is not only a new entry but indeed it leads the way. Its $388.9bn of funds comes from just 24 advisers and 69 funds, however, as can be seen in Table 4a. If you dig deeper into those funds, the outlier is a $372bn Luxembourg-domiciled hedge fund managed by PGIM, which essentially put Credit Agricole in first position.

Sorting on the number of funds, however, shows Credit Agricole exit the top five altogether, and a new name, First Citizens Bancshares, coming in at number 2 (table 4b).

Overall, Morgan Stanley enters the top five at number five but keep an eye out – every firm in the top five has gained assets since the end of 2024 (table 5). No-one ever got fired for buying IBM, after all.

Table 4a: Top Five Fund Custodians of New Funds Identified from 2025 Form ADV Filings, Jan-Aug, sorted by GAV

RankingCustodianGAV ($bn)AdvisersFunds
1Credit Agricole$388.92469
2J.P. Morgan$345.15591,923
3Bank of New York Mellon$251.0196811
4Bank of America$226.1208723
5Citigroup$147.4135376

Table 4b: Top Five Fund Custodians of New Funds Identified from 2025 Form ADV Filings, Jan-Aug, sorted by Fund Count

RankingCustodianGAV ($bn)AdvisersFunds
1J.P. Morgan$345.15591,923
2First Citizens Bancshares$96.73131,023
3Bank of New York Mellon$251.0196811
4Bank of America$226.1208723
5US Bancorp$127.9152408

Table 5: Top Five Custodians of All Funds Identified from latest Form ADV Filings, as of Aug 31, 2025

RankingCustodianFunds GAV- Current ($bn)Funds GAV- YE2024 ($bn)% Market Share- Current% Market Share- YE2024
1J.P. Morgan$ 13,078$ 11,88111%11%
2Bank of America$ 10,257$ 9,2058%8%
3Bank of New York Mellon$ 9,681$ 8,9518%8%
4Citigroup$ 7,030$ 6,5076%6%
5Morgan Stanley$ 6,740$ 5,5896%5%

Prime Brokers

Same old, same old for the prime broker set. Last year, JP Morgan, Barclays, Citi, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs took the top five slots for new funds, and the quintet do so again this year – albeit in a different order (table 6a).

Sorting by fund count tells a different story, however. Interactive Brokers comes in at number two (table 6b). Its 175 funds account for only $15bn in GAV, indicating a strong presence in the small and emerging manager category.

Citigroup featured in the top five new funds league table both last year and this year, but does not in the overall list – yet. It sits sixth, around $1.2 trillion short of Bank of America.

Table 6a: Top Five Fund Prime Brokers of New Hedge Funds Identified from 2025 Form ADV Filings, Jan-Aug, sorted by GAV

RankingPrime BrokerGAV ($bn)AdvisersFunds
1Morgan Stanley$127.6123198
2J.P. Morgan$119.586124
3Goldman Sachs$94.4101154
4Barclays$76.42233
5Citigroup$75.22232

Table 6b: Top Five Fund Prime Brokers of New Hedge Funds Identified from 2025 Form ADV Filings, Jan-Aug, sorted by Fund Count

RankingPrime BrokerGAV ($bn)AdvisersFunds
1Morgan Stanley$127.6123198
2Interactive Brokers$15.0156175
3Goldman Sachs$94.4101154
4J.P. Morgan$119.586124
5Bank of America$72.14884

Table 7: Top Five Prime Brokers of All Hedge Funds Identified from latest Form ADV Filings, as of Aug 31, 2025

RankingPrime BrokerFunds GAV- Current ($bn)Funds GAV- YE2024 ($bn)% Market Share- Current% Market Share- YE2024
1J.P. Morgan$ 7,589$ 6,62611%11%
2Morgan Stanley$ 7,427$ 6,22711%11%
3Goldman Sachs$ 7,162$ 6,45310%11%
4Barclays$ 6,506$ 5,3599%9%
5Bank of America$ 6,418$ 5,3689%9%

Administrators

Are we saving the most interesting category for last? After all, last year, data from the 9AT database showed that the admin category is the one where the firms atop the leaderboard have the smallest market share when compared to their audit, custody and prime broker peers, indicating a much more fractured and competitive market.

We are. In the new funds category, change is afoot. While CITCO and SS&C Technologies top the leaderboard (after coming in fourth and fifth in last year’s new funds table), when sorting by GAV, three new names appear this time: SEI Investments, Apex Group and Hedgeserv.

When sorting by fund count, however, Carta, which began life helping startups manage their cap tables, and has since built a fund administration service, takes the top spot. One to keep an eye on in future updates to this article, apparently.

Still, they have a way to go to break into the top five overall – which Apex has done this year, dislodging Bank of New York Mellon. The top four from last year – SS&C Technologies, Citco, State Street and Northern Trust – remain this year, in that very same order.

Table 8a: Top Five Fund Administrators of New Funds Identified from 2025 Form ADV Filings, Jan-Aug, sorted by GAV

RankingAdministratorGAV ($bn)AdvisersFunds
1CITCO$503.1108307
2SS&C Technologies$109.5204490
3SEI Investments$93.159390
4Apex Group$73.5175412
5HedgeServ$59.03491

Table 8b: Top Five Fund Administrators of New Funds Identified from 2025 Form ADV Filings, Jan-Aug, sorted by Fund Count

RankingAdministratorGAV ($bn)AdvisersFunds
1Carta$8.0208541
2SS&C Technologies$109.5204490
3NAV Consulting$24.1257424
4Apex Group$73.5175412
5SEI Investments$93.159390

Table 9: Top Five Fund Administrators of All Funds Identified from latest Form ADV Filings, as of Aug 31, 2025

RankingAdministratorFunds GAV- Current ($bn)Funds GAV- YE2024 ($bn)% Market Share- Current% Market Share- YE2024
1SS&C Technologies$ 4,110$ 3,89515%15%
2CITCO$ 3,960$ 3,07515%12%
3State Street$ 1,987$ 2,2097%9%
4Northern Trust$ 1,788$ 1,6437%6%
5Apex Group$ 1,429$ 1,3495%5%

 

It is well worth noting that these league tables look across all fund categories, lumping together hedge, PE, and VC into one broad brushstroke. Breaking up the data by different parameters- such as fund type, size, domicile, etc.- yields even more interesting findings. Users of our database can use our League Table page to dig even deeper to see rankings within various combinations of parameters. 

We’ll likely revisit these league tables again at some point – while most of the names on these lists will be unsurprising to many, some most certainly will be, and it will be interesting to see how some of the challenger firms fare over the next 12 months and beyond.

Editor's Picks:

Here are a handful of articles that we’ve seen recently that we found interesting. Hopefully, you do, too!

Previous